Many people are talking about the income gap between the have and the have-nots. Having real data provides meaning to the observations sited as fact by many pundits. Catey Hill...
Rochelle Riley’s article is a nice first step to understanding how the presidential vote was casts, especially in Michigan. Using our “lean” eyes, several interesting why should appear after reading the article.
- Why did women not vote as a block to support her presidency?
- Were their different segments of the population not treated as a voting block that voted a certain way?
- Was there a feeling of entitlement for the presidency than in the past?
- Was there something different in other glass-ceiling movements that didn’t occur in this instance?
The article addresses the first issue regarding women not voting as a block support. It is being reported that only a 12 point gap was earned in the women vote in Michigan and actually lost when compared to women without college degrees. I think we can agree that is considered common in today’s politics. Is that bias? Data is needed to support that argument. It is too early to tell if this is the case in this political race. We know there are a lot of resources being used to determine this and more issues. Time will tell.
I am intriguer by the other lean observations. We need to remember all votes count and all votes have representation under the Electoral College to avoid skewing of policies in the republic. Please let me know your thoughts on the issue.
Gary Kapanowski – Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt – Excelsior
The following blog is the opinion of Gary Kapanowski and Garykapanowski.com. It is the sole intent to broadcast this opinion from Gary Kapanowski and Garykapanowski.com exclusively and not to reflect on any other institutions or organizations associated with Gary Kapanowski or Garykapanowski.com.